Модератори: Ksantip, Sharana, ISTORIK, Amazon
Вярно, много съм разсеян напоследък.
Торн, само в твоята паралелна Вселена един диктатор може да "освобождава" (каквото и да е).
. Хитряга.
Спорно твърдение.
Да, това е така.
Колкото и да е смешно, тук си прав. Ако броим едно поколение за 25-30 години, Мустафа Кемал точно тогава идва.
Падна в капана.Thorn написа: ↑28 Юли 2017, 13:31Колкото и да е смешно, тук си прав. Ако броим едно поколение за 25-30 години, Мустафа Кемал точно тогава идва.
Но примерът е ирелевантен, защото става дума за етническа дискриминация.
А хайдуци оскотели бандити - това примерно ако се дадеше властта на религиозните фанатици, каквито е имало предостатъчно в Турция.
1. Въобще не е спорно. От 6 години чакам някой да извади статистика, показваща обратното. Тишината е оглушителна.
Ами сам си е виновен, като ти се връзва на некоректните аналогииПадна в капана.
. По-коректна можеше да се окаже френската революция от периода на якобинците май, а;). Пък току-виж бе изплувал нов Наполеон от кланът Асад, ако "революцията" бе постигнала въобще някакъв успех, освен пълната разруха на страната и възхода на местни феодали във всички цветове? . 
Добре, че ми напомни. Загубих ти някъде поста със статията, но мога да спомогна за твоето образование. Полека-лека може да започнеш да осъзнаваш, че в БИ нищо не е толкова просто, колкото изглежда.
https://www.usip.org/publications/2007/ ... iance-iranIncreasingly bound by a series of overlapping interests in the Middle East and their joint antipathy to the West, Syria and Iran have forged an enduring alliance that has superseded the fundamental differences dividing the two countries (e.g., Arab versus Persian, secular versus theocratic, Sunni-majority versus Shiite). While the countries have been allies since the late 1970s, their alliance has strengthened noticeably over the past three years as both Syria and Iran have faced with mounting isolation from the West. Both countries strongly oppose the U.S. role in Iraq; they both support Hezbollah in Lebanon and Hamas in Palestine. Indeed, they are bound by shared enmity toward the United States, seeking instead to define a new Middle East order that rejects American influence in the region.
Cooperation between the two countries has increased in several spheres. Militarily, the countries signed a mutual defense pact in June 2006 (a text has never been released) and an additional military cooperation agreement in March 2007. (Earlier, in 2004, the countries signed a "strategic cooperation" agreement.) Security and military cooperation reportedly also includes Iranian missile sales to Syria, as well as ongoing intelligence cooperation with Tehran reportedly providing equipment and training to Syrian operatives.
Direct Iranian investment in Syria has increased to record levels over the past few years. The two countries have signed trade and economic cooperation agreements across numerous sectors from telecommunications to agriculture to petroleum, representing potentially $1–$3 billion in new Iranian investment. Joint Syrian-Iranian ventures currently include a newly opened $60 million car factory, Syria’s first domestically produced automobile, and the purchase of a new fleet of buses from Iran. There are also plans to build oil refineries, wheat silos, a cement plant, and to renovate the Kirkuk-Baniyas oil pipeline, which would carry oil from neighboring Iraq to the Syrian coast.
Cultural exchanges and cooperation are also on the rise. Iran currently operates at least two cultural centers (in Damascus and Latakia) and pours millions of dollars into the restoration of Shiite shrines located throughout Syria. An estimated 500,000–one million Iranian tourists make pilgrimages to these shrines annually. Private Iranian money is also funding a number of hawzas, Shiite seminaries, across Syria. Rumors circulating Syria that wealthy Iranian pilgrims are paying Syrians to convert to Shia Islam constitute a potentially ominous element of cultural cooperation.
Потребители разглеждащи този форум: 0 регистрирани
