




James Crisp
Потвърден профил @JamesCrisp6
15 минПреди 15 минути
Senior EU diplomat on May exit:
"There are some of us who would welcome Boris. It simplifies things. It means the choice is no deal or remain. And Boris can only go one way"



Манталитет, култура, възпитание...
Nigel Farage’s Brexit party was in contention to be the biggest single national party in the parliament, potentially beating both Angela Merkel’s Christian Democratic Union and Matteo Salvini’s rightwing League: FT
Това не е ли парадокс?
EU Parliament Final Results (GB):
BXP: 29 (+29)
LDM: 16 (+15)
LAB: 10 (-9)
GRN: 7 (+4)
SNP: 3 (+1)
CON: 4 (-16)
PLC: 1 (=)
UKIP: 0 (-24)
Changes w/ 2014 #EP2019


Our latest Westminster voting intention has the Lib Dems in first place and the Brexit Party second place, with Labour and the Tories pushed into third: Lib Dem - 24% (+6)
Brexit Party - 22% (+4)
Con - 19% (-5)
Labour - 19% (-5)
Green - 8% (+2)
UKIP - 1%
Change UK - 1%
Other - 6%
https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/ar ... 9_May_2019 …


Много интересно - лейбъристите и Корбин ще трябва да поемат твърд курс втори референдум, ако искат да не бъдат пометени на следващите избори, а консерваторите изглеждат в почти безнадежно положение - ако тенденцията продължи рискуват въобще да престанат да съществуват като партия. Новия лидер на торите ще трябва да е нещо повече от Господ, за да върне загубените гласове обратно.Flavible FPTP Projection
Lab : 184 (-78)
LDem : 175 (+163)
BRX : 134 (+134)
Con : 83 (-235)
SNP : 49 (+14)
PC : 4 (=)
Grn : 2 (+1)
Ind : 1 (+1)
Changes with GE2017
I very rarely comment on US politics. I simply don't know enough about the system and have insufficient awareness of the nuances that make transatlantic politics special and different. Hence I have little to offer and could end up misreading the signs, drawing entirely the wrong conclusions.
That said, I wish US commentators would exercise the same caution when it comes to making observations on UK politics. And that particularly applies to Donald Trump, whose intervention on behalf of the turd-giver is singularly unwelcome.
Speaking glowingly of the ex-Foreign Secretary in a world exclusive interview with The Sun, POTUS declares that he has studied the Tory leadership contest "very hard" and knows the different players. "But", he says, "I think Boris would do a very good job. I think he would be excellent".
At least The Sun is sufficiently on the ball to realise that this intervention - just a few days before MPs start voting - is a major breach of protocol. It risks, says the paper, sparking a full-blown diplomatic rift between London and Washington if the turd-giver fails to take the Tory crown.
More to the point though, foreign politicians simply have no business interfering in UK domestic politics, and especially in support of such a tawdry and controversial character who, by any measure, is entirely unfit to take the office of prime minister.
As for Mr Trump, he seems to be finding it difficult enough looking after the affairs of the United States. He would, thus, be better advised to mind his own business, and keep his own counsel on matters that are not his concern.
Richard North 01/06/2019
Да не им е зле? Ще спрат да изливат пари в Шотландия - само безусловните са 30 милиарда паунда годишно и ще се отърват от онова буре с барут - Северна Ирландия. Шотландците на север ще умрат от глад...или от скурбут. И без това англичаните дори не им разбират, като говорят. Колега от Лондон се оплакваше, че като го пратели там в командировка и влезел в кръчмата, като му говорели само кимал и се усмихвал, да не го раберат че бъкел не им разбира.
Защото най-интересното, което се случва е:
Потребители разглеждащи този форум: Dinain