https://southfront.org/professor-ivo-hr ... ew-part-2/
Втората част на интервюто с проф.Христов относно развитието на ситуацията в Северн Сирия. Не го четох - за съжаление няколко пъти го улавям в дребни манипулацийки, да не говорим, че като гледах 10-20 клипа с него, той се оказа, че повтаря дума по дума едно и също...И гледа да внуши, че българите сме някакви унтермешени... За капак(не съм на 100% сигурен, може и да ви заблуждавам), на въпрос дали ще стане депутат беше отказал такава опция.
Това, което е хубаво, че в коментарите пак го хващат в крачка:
► Show Spoiler
Eskandar Black • 7 hours ago
False Statements.
1. "China is interested greatly in resolving the situation in Syria, and
they’ve sent 5000 units from their special forces to Damascus" This is online gossip, nothing more.The Uighur Chinese special forces thing is several Asian looking Russian special forces playing a good joke on an idiot reporter. Those guys believe anything a guy with an AK says over a cigarette. They should research Russian humor before deploying to such places.
2."First, Turkey is doing the dirty work of Russia by removing the US military and geopolitical interest from the region." He assumes what he is trying to prove. It is unclear how giving Afrin, a region separated from other Kurds and US control over to FSA to establish a buffer between Turkey and Syria would be in the Russian interest. The entire mess could break into a war and render the Russian base unusable due to a regional conflict. Not clear at all the Russia benefits more than it risks.
3. "Second, groups who are disloyal to the Syrian government are put in check, and these territories will be to some extent given back under the control of Assad." Turkey has announced they do not plan to turn territory over to Syria. Erdogan is no friend of Syria, or his own shadow for that matter. Not clear how Turkey capturing territory doesn't make a bad situation worse. It would be much harder to fight the Turkish backed FSA than the Kurds; the only real difference being is that it would bring the war to a part of Syria that has enjoyed relative peace and stability, until now.
4. "Third, while everyone is looking at Afrin, without notice, the Syrian army is destroying, take notice, the pro-Turkish groups in Idlib which is actually the much bigger problem. You have there about 30 000 jihadists who were concentrated there from all part of Syria and are now being destroyed by General al-Hassan and the Tiger Forces." I love how the so-called professor is surprised the Syrian army is destroying the FSA savages in Idlib. What did you think the rest of were saying when for 7 years everyone including the Pentagon understands that Jihadists arent a real army, and while capable of gruesome violence and savagery towards unarmed, poorly trained, disorganized local forces in 7 years ago, today, they get their ass handed to them by a professional Syrian army. No, one here is surprised, and people follow the destruction of jihadist terrorists with coffee and popcorn. This Afrin thing is not some distracting event; it is a reaction to the UNITED STATES indicating a permanent presence in the region. To some extent, the US attack on mostly Russian private contractors and some local Arabs was a political response to the relatively low-cost Russian demolition campaign. Same is likely true of the manpad attack on a Russian aircraft, the Israeli airstrikes and periodic assaults by the FSA terrorists. These moves are not designed for any specific purpose other than to force Assad to split his forces to deal with multiple simultaneous threats.
The profound idea here is that Russia benefits from conflict with US and Turkey? Of course, they do, why do you think Russia sold them the S400? A lot of nonsense and ridiculous assumptions to conclude something self-evident. Very poorly reasoned interview without any pressing questions.