Ти се притесняваше, че до края на 4 февруари Залужни със сигурност ще бъде уволнен и заменен с Буданов:Защо? написа: ↑06 Фев 2024, 12:38Според думите на самия Зеленски, не само Залужни ще бъде уволнен, но за жалост се очаква голяма чистка, по всички нива - точно каквото се притеснявах че ще се случи. Не знам какви партенки те гонят.
In an interview with Italian news outlet RAI published on Sunday, Zelensky said that “a new beginning is necessary,” and that he has “something serious in mind, which does not concern a single person but the direction of the country’s leadership.”
“When we talk about this, I mean a replacement of a series of state leaders, not just in a single sector like the military,” Zelensky told RAI.
Днес е 6 февруари и Залужни все още е главнокомандващ и ще остане такъв още неопределено време, може и до края на войната.Защо? написа: ↑01 Фев 2024, 12:37Според източници на CNN до края на седмицата, Залужни ще бъде разкаран. Ако Буданов го смени, това ще е пълна катастрофа. Буданов няма почти никакъв опит.
След провала на лятната офанзива, това ще е ново 20...
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/02/01/poli ... index.html
Ерго статията в СНН е партенка.
И в интервюто пред РАИ Зеленски не казва, че ще уволни Залужни, а че се обмисля голяма кадрова промяна на базата на извършващ се в момента анализ на действията и постиженията/резултатите на хора на ключови позиции през двете години война.
Никой не е имунизиран, но конкретни кадрови решения все още няма взети.
Ако и когато уволни Залужни ще има какво да се обсъжда, а сега почти всеки ден някой излиза със "сигурна" информация, че Залужни вече е уволнен. Последно Бутусов го уволни вчера, като каза, че това ще се случи вчера вечерта.
Дотогава всички тези гръмки инсайди са партенки пускани от руснята, политически противници на Зеленски и западните русофили и полезни идиоти.
Това е.
”
Reproduction of the chronology of battles in the Krokhmalnoye area
♂️ Due to certain circumstances and the insufficient amount of information about the nature of hostilities, it is impossible to make an After Action Review , but it is quite possible to reproduce the events and point out traditional mistakes.
The situation worsened on January 18, when a significant section of the front collapsed. One of the battalions of the 103rd did not even know about it, and was, to put it mildly, surprised when the pods began to climb into their rear. Approximately, at least 11 SPs and VOPs were lost during this day. Neighboring units generally learned about the failure of the front when they saw the changes on the map. I think it is unnecessary to explain what was felt in Kislivka and Kotlyarivka. At the same time, the leadership of the brigade tried to hide the losses as much as possible. When we began to pass information about the failure through our connections, everyone was surprised. Moreover, many officials denied the information.
The enemy did not stop at this and approximately on January 27 climbed Tabaivka again this time. In the end, the Katsapas managed to capture the village, but due to its geography and the lack of buildings as such, it did not manage to gain a foothold. This time the situation there was under the close control of everyone, which did not allow the enemy to develop success on Pischan or Berestovo.
These events are reminiscent of the enemy's summer breakthrough near Novoyehorivka and Nadia. Since the conclusions at the level of operational-tactical management of the troops were not made, a repetition took place in Tabaivka and Krokhmalny.
Information appeared in the mass media about the suspension of the 103rd brigade commander of the OBrTrO, our acquaintances also confirm this fact. His further fate is unknown, and there is no official news on this matter. The plans of the enemy in this area were known in advance.
to at least 25,000 APKWS AURs annually, x10 greater than Russian and Iranian Shahed-136 production
